Guidelines for Authors
Medicine and Health accepts articles for publication provided they are original contributions and are not under consideration by other journals at the time of submission. No articles are published without the signed copyright form.
Authorship
All authors listed on this manuscript should meet the authorship criteria as outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Specifically, each author should have made substantial contributions to one or more of the following: conception and design of the study, acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; drafting or critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content; and approving the final version to be published. Furthermore, all authors should agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to accuracy or integrity are appropriately investigated and resolved. Authorship credit should be based solely on these contributions and not merely on participation in funding acquisition or general supervision. Artificial intelligence (AI) or large language models (LLMs) are not qualified and should not be listed as authors.
Article processing charges (APC)
All manuscripts accepted after June 2025 will be charged a fee of RM 1000.00 (or 250 USD for non-Malaysian corresponding authors) for full reports/reviews or RM 500.00 (or 150 USD for non-Malaysian corresponding authors) for case reports to cover the publication expenses. The implementation of APC (or its waiver) will not affect the normal editorial process of the journal and DOES NOT GUARANTEE the acceptance of a manuscript.
Copyright
All manuscripts accepted by this journal will be published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License 4.0. The authors shall retain the right. The readers may copy and distribute the published data with adequate acknowledgement and citation. Authors are requested to fill out the Declaration Form before the manuscript is published.
Conflict of interest and source of funding
The conflict of interest occurs when a researcher's personal, professional, or financial interests could potentially compromise their objectivity or judgment in conducting or reporting research. The authors should clearly state the conflict of interest (if any) and disclose the source of funding.
Ethics
Publication in Medicine & Health implies that the authors agree, upon reasonable request, to share any materials or data that are integral to the results presented in the article, including whatever would be necessary for a skilled investigator to verify or replicate the claims. Authors must disclose upon submission any restrictions on the availability of materials or information, such as for patented or dual-purpose materials.
Authors must affirm that the research protocol was approved by the appropriate institutional review boards or ethics committees for human (including use of human cells or tissues) or animal experiments and that all human subjects provided appropriate informed consent and/or that regulations concerning the use of animals in research were adhered to.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism, including self-publication, is a serious offence. All submitted manuscripts are processed through plagiarism-checking software. The editor-in-chief reserves the right to take any action once the manuscript is detected for plagiarism during the pre-publication process and post-publication discussion, including withdrawing the article (with retraction notice) and notifying the author’s institution. The same policy also applies to fabrication and falsification of data and image manipulation.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs)
Authors are encouraged to disclose any use of AI-based software or algorithms that contributed substantially to data analysis, writing, figure generation, or other aspects of their submission. While AI can enhance efficiency and accuracy, it must not replace critical human judgment or compromise the originality and integrity of the work. Manuscripts generated wholly or partially by AI should be carefully reviewed by authors to verify accuracy and avoid errors or biases introduced by automated processes. Additionally, appropriate acknowledgement should be given when specific AI tools have influenced the research outcomes.
Declaration Form
The authors must fill out and sign the declaration form and submit it during the proofreading process before the article is published. Download form
Nomination of peer reviewers
In the cover letter and manuscript submission system, the authors should nominate 3-5 peer reviewers who are experts in the field, who have not published with the authors recently and do not share the same affiliation. Please know that any practices that jeopardize the peer review process, if discovered, will lead to immediate manuscript rejection or article retraction.
Manuscript categories:
1. Editorials – These are usually invited or written by experts in their field.
2. Case Report/ Correspondence – Case report should describe a new case and highlight the differential diagnosis and the challenges encountered while treating. The maximum word count is 2000 words, excluding abstract and references.
3. Original Research – This article type should present new (never published previously) and primary findings generated directly by the researchers through scientific investigation. It should contain sections such as introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion and acknowledgement (if any). The maximum word count is 6000 words, excluding abstract and references. We encourage the authors to follow the standard reporting guidelines of their study type, and attach the respective checklist as supplementary materials during submission to showcase adherence to the respective guidelines.
4. Reviews – Systematic reviews and meta analysis may be submitted. The authors may liaise with the editor before sending any review article. The maximum word count is 8000 words, excluding abstract and references. For systematic reviews and meta-analyses,, PRISMA/PRISMA-ScR guidelines are to be followed, and the respective checklists should be attached to showcase adherence to the respective guidelines during submission.
5. Letters to the Editor – Letters pertaining to any published article within 6 weeks of publication, or concerning any important topic, may be submitted. The maximum word count is 500 words. The editor-in-chief reserves the right to accept or reject any submission.
6. Clinical Quiz – Readers and authors are encouraged to send any interesting clinical case for quiz. The case should be described in 750 words and have maximum of 2 figures.
7. Latest Techniques/Innovations/Methods – Authors who wish to share any latest techniques, innovations or methods which may be beneficial for the advancement of medical science, may submit under this section. No particular subheadings are needed, but a short abstract within 100 words should be included. The maximum word count should be within 1500 words.
Manuscript format
All sections should begin in a new page. The text should be written in Times New Roman, 12 font size.
The text should be written in double-spaced, typing with left and right margins justified. The pages should be numbered at the bottom in the centre.
Title
The title should clearly state the type of work done. It is advisable not to use a title which is too long.
Abstract
The text should be unstructured, and the total word count should not exceed 250 words. Both abstracts in English and Bahasa Malaysia should be submitted. Non-Malaysian authors can use a machine translation service to construct the abstract in Bahasa Malaysia, but the action should be declared.
Short running title
The title page should have a short running title.
Keywords
At least 3 keywords, separated by semicolons (;), should be given as per MeSH style. Preferably, the keywords should be different from the title words.
Text
The remaining sections of the text should be sectioned into Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Acknowledgments for original articles. Review articles are allowed to be structured differently, but should begin with an Introduction and end with a Conclusion. Each section should not begin on a new page. Commonly abbreviated terms should be spelled out in their first occurrence and then may be referenced in abbreviation throughout the remainder of the manuscript.
- Introduction - The Introduction section should be written from the standpoint of researchers without specialist knowledge in that area and must clearly state - and, if helpful, illustrate - the background to the research and its aims. Reports of clinical research should, where appropriate, include a summary of a search of the literature to indicate why this study was necessary and what it aimed to contribute to the field. The section should end with a very brief statement of what is being reported in the article.
- Materials and Methods - Authors should describe experimental and statistical methods in enough detail that other researchers can replicate results and evaluate claims. In general, the inclusion of method or reagent details as supplementary material is not acceptable. The sequences of oligonucleotides, if not previously published, should be provided. Novel DNA or protein sequences should be deposited in an appropriate database (eg, Genbank, EMBL, Swiss-Prot), with the accession numbers included in the manuscript. When providing supplier information for material sources, the company name and location (city and state, or city and country) should be provided. Website references to company information are not permitted. All novel materials and the procedures to prepare them should be described in sufficient detail to allow their reproduction (e.g., DNA constructs, analytical software).
- Results and Discussion - The Results and Discussion may be combined into a single section or presented separately. Results should present a detailed description of the findings in the text and/or tables and figures (but should avoid duplication of findings' description). Results of statistical analysis should include, where appropriate, relative and absolute risks or risk reductions, and confidence intervals. The results and discussion sections may also be broken into subsections with short, informative headings. Discussion may usefully start with a brief summary of the major findings, but repetition of parts of the abstract or of the results section should be avoided. Discussion should appraise implications of the findings and place them in the context of prior reports. The focus should be on the importance of these findings to the field and/or patient care.
- Conclusion - This should state clearly the main conclusions of the research and give a clear explanation of their importance and relevance. Summary illustrations may be included.
- Acknowledgement - Please acknowledge anyone who contributed towards the study by making substantial contributions to conception, design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, or who was involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content, but who does not meet the criteria for authorship. Please also include their source(s) of funding. Please also acknowledge anyone who contributed materials essential for the study. Authors should obtain permission to acknowledge from all those mentioned in the Acknowledgements. The use of artificial intelligence or large language models in any aspect of crafting this manuscript should be acknowledged here.
References
The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the references. References should begin on a new page, be double-spaced, and be listed alphabetically. Complete author citation is required (use of "et al" is not acceptable). References should conform to the style of the Journal.
References in the text to articles, chapters, monographs or other publications should contain the authors’ names followed by the year of publication without punctuation mark, e.g. (Ismail 1997) or Ismail (1997). References cited only in legends should be numbered in accordance with a sequence established by the first identification in the text of the particular table or illustration.
The references themselves should be abbreviated according to the style used in Index Medicus or the World List of Scientific Periodicals, 4th edition. Unpublished observations and personal communications should not be listed but may be inserted in the text. Papers which have been accepted for publication should be included in the list of references as ‘in press’. Authors are responsible for verifying the wording of all reference and that references of unpublished work are approved by the original author.
Medicine & Health reference style:
In reference list | In text |
Article within a journal Koonin, E.V., Altschul, S.F., Bork, P. 1996. BRCA1 protein products: functional motifs. Nat Genet 13: 266-267. | (Koonin et al. 1996) |
Article within a journal supplement Orengo , C.A. , Bray, J.E., Hubbard, T., LoConte, L., Sillitoe, I. 1999. Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction. Proteins 43(Suppl 3): 149-170. | (Orengo et al. 1999) |
In press article Kharitonov , S.A. , Barnes, P.J. Clinical aspects of exhaled nitric oxide. Eur Respir J, in press. | (Kharitonov & Barnes, in press) |
Published abstract Zvaifler , N.J., Burger, J.A., Marinova-Mutafchieva, L., Taylor, P., Maini, R.N. 1999. Mesenchymal cells, stromal derived factor-1 and rheumatoid arthritis [abstract].Arthritis Rheum 42:s250. | (Zvaifler et al. 1999) |
Article within conference proceedings Jones, X. 1996. Zeolites and synthetic mechanisms. In Proceed-ings of the First National Confe-rence on Porous Sieves: 27-30 June 1996; Baltimore. Edited by Smith Y. Stoneham: Butterworth-Heinemann; 16-27. | (Jones 1996) |
Book chapter, or article within a book Schnepf, E. 1993. From prey via endosymbiont to plastids: compa-rative studies in dinoflagellates. In Origins of Plastids. Volume 2. 2nd edition. Edited by Lewin RA. New York: Chapman and Hall; 53-76. | (Schnepf 1993) |
Whole issue of journal Ponder, B., Johnston, S., Chodosh, L. (Eds). 1998. Innovative onco-logy. In Breast Cancer Res, 10:1-72. | (Ponder et al. 1998) |
Whole conference proceedings Smith, Y. (Ed). 1996. Proceedings of the First National Conference on Porous Sieves: 27-30 June 1996; Baltimore. Stoneham: Butterworth-Heinemann. | (Smith 1996) |
Complete book Margulis, L. 1970. Origin of Eukaryotic Cells. New Haven: Yale University Press. | (Margulis 1970) |
Monograph or book in a series Hunninghake, G.W., Gadek, J.E. 1995. The alveolar macrophage. In Cultured Human Cells and Tissues. Edited by Harris, T.J.R. New York: Academic Press; 54-56. [Stoner G (Series Editor): Methods and Perspectives in Cell Biology, vol 1.] | (Hunninghake & Gadek 1995) |
Book with institutional author Advisory Committee on Genetic Modification. 1999. Annual Report. London. | (Advisory Committee on Genetic Modification 1999) |
PhD thesis Kohavi, R. 1995. Wrappers for performance enhancement and oblivious decision graphs.PhD thesis. Stanford University, Compu-ter Science Department. | (Kohavi 1995) |
Link / URL Hostin, L.O. 1996. Drug use and HIV/AIDS [JAMA HIV/AIDS Web site]. http://www.amaassn.org/special/hiv [26 June 1997]. | (Hostin 1996) |
Tables
Tables should be typed double-spaced and submitted on separate files, as part of the manuscript. Tables should be black and white text only and should not include figures or other non-typeset images.
Create tables using the table creating and editing feature of your word processing software (e.g. Word, WordPerfect). Do not use Excel or comparable spreadsheet programs. Group all tables in a separate file. Cite tables consecutively in the text, and number them in that order. Each table should appear on a separate page and should include the table title, appropriate column heads, and explanatory legends (including definitions of any abbreviations used). Do not embed tables within the body of the manuscript. They should be self-explanatory and should supplement, rather than duplicate, the material in the text.
Figures
Authors should give considerable care in preparing figures. Composites consisting of multiple figures on one page are not allowed. When preparing composite figures, the front side of individual parts should be clearly and properly labelled, must be converted to paths or outlines or they must be embedded in the files. Cite figures consecutively on the site, and number them in the order in which they are discussed.
Digital figure in JPEG format should be provided for publication purposes. The resolution should be 300 dpi. Figures deviating from these dimensions will be sized at the publisher's discretion. Unwanted background material should be excluded and edges should be straight.
Figure Legends. Legends must be submitted for all figures. They should be brief and specific, and they should appear on a separate manuscript page after the references. Figures may consist of multiple related panels (labelled A, B, C, etc.) described under one figure legend. Use scale markers in the image for electron micrographs, and indicate the type of stain used.
Proof
The corresponding author will be contacted by email once proofs are ready. The author should check the proofs carefully, mark any printer's errors, and answer queries as requested. Author changes should be kept to a minimum. Proof corrections and replacement figures (if any) must be returned within seven days to avoid any delay in publication.
Editorial Communications
All correspondence concerning editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief, at the following address:
Medicine & Health,
Secretariat of Research & Innovation,
Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,
Level 6, Preclinical Building, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak
56000 Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA,
Tel: 03-9145 8798 or
Email: medhealthukm@gmail.com